This finding arose through experiments designed to test theories of how people learn to move. The central claim of these theories is that the nervous system does not move as accurately as it possibly can, but instead selects coordination patterns that are a compromise between accuracy and energetic cost. These theories, while influential, have proven difficult to test resulting in little scientific evidence to support the role of continuous energy optimization. Until now.
PhD student and lead author Jessica Selinger explains how she tackled this problem: «We asked participants to wear a robotic exoskeleton that made certain abnormal ways of walking energetically easier than walking in a ‘normal’ way. They accomplished this by applying high energetic penalties to ‘normal’ ways of walking, and much smaller penalties to specific abnormal way of walking.»
Researchers found that after just minutes of wearing the exoskeletons, people changed fundamental characteristics of their
«And, they did this even to gain just a few percent savings in energetic cost," notes Selinger. «Sensing and optimizing energy use that quickly and accurately is an impressive feat on the part of the nervous system. You have to be smart to be that lazy!»
Donelan adds: «While we suspected that the nervous system could optimize energy use, it was surprising to us how small of a cost it cared about. We found that people would adapt their gait even in response to remarkably small energetic savings, at times for less than five per cent of their total cost. Had they simply suffered this small penalty, their energetic debt after one hour of walking would be roughly equivalent to the energy contained in a single peanut. The savings were literally peanuts!»
It makes sense that our movements remain malleable because people’s bodies, and the tasks they are presented with, can change, Donelan adds.
«Continuous energetic optimization benefits our ability to adapt our movements by keeping them close to energetically optimal. It helps backpackers efficiently adapt to changing terrains, it helps patients compensate for movement deficits after injury or disease, and, for better or worse, it helps all of us move with as little energy as possible.»
Support for this work came from a Vanier Canadian Graduate Scholarship (J.C.S), a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Fellowship (J.D.W), and a grant from the
WHY IT MATTERS:
Why do we walk the way we do? While many of us have puzzled over this question, it is also a matter of scientific importance to a diverse range of disciplines that include neuroscientists, biomechanists, medical practitioners, anthropologists, control theorists and roboticists. The present study contributes a key answer by showing that the nervous system controls our movements to quickly and precisely minimize energetic cost. The results have broad implications for those seeking to rehabilitate mobility disorders, understand the evolution of bipedalism in hominids, or design efficient legged robots, to name a few.
Source: http://www.sfu.ca/sfunews/stories/2015/wired-for-laziness.html?utm_source=hmpgr&utm_medium=exoskeleton&utm_campaign=va
